skip to Main Content

Week 8 discussion DQ1 Reflecting on Bias Researcher bias is a critical concern f

Week 8 discussion DQ1 Reflecting on Bias Researcher bias is a critical concern for the field of qualitative research. Qualitative researchers may allow their subjective view(s) to cloud or distort an accurate response from an interviewee or to inadvertently drive a participant to a predetermined conclusion, thus negatively impacting the findings. Therefore, it is critical for qualitative researchers to understand, identify, and address any biases they might have regarding the topic of investigation. It would be impossible to remove all bias because you are a human being. Rather, one mitigates bias as best as one can. Mitigating bias can be demonstrated via using an interview protocol, member checking, data saturation, and other strategies to limit the use of one personal lens during the data collection process of your study. To prepare for this Discussion, consider what you have read about bias, as well as your experiences as an independent scholar and doctoral researcher thus far. Reflect on any preconceived biases you might have that would impact your ability to remain objective. By Day 3 Post an evaluation of ethical considerations for independent scholars within the doctoral research process. In your evaluation, do the following: Briefly describe your problem statement and the topic you have chosen for your individual Doctoral Study. Analyze any potential biases, assumptions, and attitudes that may impact your Doctoral Study, including how you identified these issues. Explain potential strategies for addressing and limiting the negative impact of your own biases, assumptions, and attitudes on your study. Be sure to provide scholarly examples to support your explanation. Be sure to support your work with a minimum of two specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and one or more additional scholarly sources. Refer to the Week 8 Discussion 1 Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work. Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings. By Day 5 Respond to two or more of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways: Address a colleague’s analysis and evaluation of the topic(s). Expand or remark upon a colleague’s integration of relevant resources. Answer question(s) posed by your colleague(s) for further discussion. Link a colleague’s posting to other postings or to course materials and concepts, where appropriate and relevant. Extend or constructively challenge your colleagues’ work. Please note that for each response you must include a minimum of one appropriately cited scholarly reference. Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what insights you gained as a result of reading the comments your colleagues made. Click on the Reply button below to reveal the textbox for entering your message. Then click on the Submit button to post your message. DQ2 Doctoral Study and the Scholar-Practitioner Model Social change and the scholar-practitioner model are vital aspects of the Walden mission. The courses you take in this program are designed to support you in your quest for effecting positive social change and becoming a successful scholar-practitioner. Moreover, the Walden DBA independent scholar must show evidence of the potential positive social change benefits of their scholarly contributions to the field. To prepare for this Discussion, reflect upon how your Doctoral Study concept has evolved since the beginning of this course and the ways in which you have built a solid foundation for your Doctoral Study project. By Day 4 Post an assessment of the doctoral research process within the context of the scholar-practitioner model. In your assessment, do the following: Describe how your particular Doctoral Study might bring about improvement on management or business practice. Reflect on the most important components of the doctoral research process from your perspective as an independent scholar. Be sure to support your work with a minimum of two specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and one or more additional scholarly sources. Refer to the Week 8 Discussion 2 Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work. Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings. By Day 6 Respond to two or more of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways: Address a colleague’s analysis and evaluation of the topic(s). Expand or remark upon a colleague’s integration of relevant resources. Answer question(s) posed by your colleague(s) for further discussion. Link a colleague’s posting to other postings or to course materials and concepts, where appropriate and relevant. Extend or constructively challenge your colleagues’ work. Please note that for each response you must include a minimum of one appropriately cited scholarly reference. Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what insights you gained as a result of reading the comments your colleagues made. Click on the Reply button below to reveal the textbox for entering your message. Then click on the Submit button to post your message.

GET HELP WITH THIS ASSIGNMENT TODAY

Clicking on this button will take you to our custom assignment page. Here you can fill out all the additional details for this particular paper (grading rubric, academic style, number of sources etc), after which your paper will get assigned to a course-specific writer. If you have any issues/concerns, please don’t hesitate to contact our live support team or email us right away.

Back To Top